Excellent letter to the editor on Syria by Peace Action Education Fund board president Mike Keller in 6/20 Washington Post

The Post argued that U.S. security interests require a “more robust . . . intervention” in the Syrian civil war ["No time

for half-measures," editorial, June 15]. A better case can be made for avoiding the fray altogether.

 

Sending medium-size and heavy weapons into Syria, with or without the establishment of a no-fly zone, could prolong the violence

and destabilize the country for years even if the Assad regime collapses. There is no way to guarantee that sophisticated

armaments will not fall into the hands of the most radical elements in the rebel camp. The United States’ experience in Afghanistan

suggests caution: The CIA helped give birth to al-Qaeda by supplying weaponry to the mujahideen to fight the Soviet Union.

Plus, in order to control the airspace over Syria, the United States would have to become a belligerent by bombing anti-aircraft

batteries, radar sites and other installations. Employing such force in the absence of a U.N. Security Council resolution

would violate international law and further strain relations with Russia and China.

 

Iraq, Afghanistan and even Libya demonstrated that U.S. military engagement in the Middle East can produce unexpected and

undesirable outcomes. What confidence can Americans have that that entanglement in the sectarian fratricide in Syria would

be different?

 

Michael J. Keller, Silver Spring

The writer is president of the Peace Action Education Fund.

About these ads

3 Responses to Excellent letter to the editor on Syria by Peace Action Education Fund board president Mike Keller in 6/20 Washington Post

  1. Does anybody know the real reasons for the violence in Syria? It is like the situation of escalation of fighting is simply a “given.” Please comment so that people will know what the Syria situation is all about. One could guess that natural resources or something of value is a major factor. One is reminded of the final scene of the movie “Full Metal Jacket” where the soldiers are singing the Mickey Mouse theme. Why are their no lengthy debates from both “sides” about the circumstances and differences between people in that region so that people will understand what is really going on? I am talking about televised debates which are 100% thorough.
    Thank you,

  2. I tend not to leave many responses, however i did a few searching
    and wound up here Excellent letter to the editor on
    Syria by Peace Action Education Fund board president Mike Keller in
    6/20 Washington Post | Peace Action Blog. And I do have 2 questions for you if it’s allright. Could it be only me or does it seem like a few of the comments come across like coming from brain dead folks? :-P And, if you are posting at additional places, I would like to follow anything new you have to post. Could you make a list of every one of all your communal sites like your linkedin profile, Facebook page or twitter feed?

  3. cd printer says:

    I will right away clutch your rss feed as I can’t to find your
    e-mail subscription hyperlink or newsletter service.
    Do you’ve any? Kindly let me understand so that I
    may just subscribe. Thanks.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 13,486 other followers

%d bloggers like this: