Excellent Talking Points on Syria from our colleague Phyllis Bennis…

…at the Institute for Policy Studies here in D.C., she has been a key ally working with Peace Action in building a coalition to stop a U.S. attack on Syria and offer better alternatives.

Institute for Policy Studies

www.ips-dc.org

 

 

WHY WE SHOULDN’T ATTACK SYRIA

Talking Points by Phyllis Bennis

9 September 2013

 

 

THE CHOICE IS NOT WAR OR NOTHING – WE HAVE OTHER OPTIONS

  • We can call for a second UN weapons inspection team, to determine who was responsible for the chemical weapons attack.
  • We can recommend that whoever is found responsible be brought to justice at the International Criminal Court, understanding that timing of such indictments might require adjustment to take into account ceasefire negotiations in Syria.
  • The US (maybe with Russia) can call for a meeting of the signers of the Convention Against Chemical Weapons – to decide collectively how to respond.
  • Most important, we must urgently to help end the war in Syria, starting with a ceasefire and arms embargo on all sides. Russia, Iran, and others must stop arming and funding the Syrian regime.  Washington, Saudi Arabia and other US allies must stop arming and funding the armed Syrian opposition.  Washington may have to threaten the Saudis and Qataris that if they don’t stop, we will cancel all existing weapons contracts with them.

 

 

MILITARY STRIKES ARE ILLEGAL

  • International law, the UN Charter, allows military action only in two cases – immediate self-defense or authorization by the Security Council.
  • Syria hasn’t attacked or threatened the U.S., so there’s no self-defense claim. And the Security Council hasn’t authorized force, and likely won’t. The UN Charter deliberately makes it really hard to get all the major powers to agree on going to war.
  • U.S. law says only Congress can declare war – President Obama has asked Congress for approval, but claims he has the right to go ahead even if they vote no. That would violate the Constitution – and with or without Congressional approval, a military strike would still violate international law.

 

 

MILITARY STRIKES ARE IMMORAL

  • Military strikes threaten harm to Syrian civilians – the Pentagon admits cruise missiles aren’t always accurate.  And the Syrian government is reportedly moving more military offices to populated areas, increasing the likelihood of civilian casualties.
  • The Obama administration admits its planned “limited surgical strikes” won’t do anything to bring the horrifying Syrian civil war to an end any quicker.

 

MILITARY STRIKES ARE DANGEROUS

  • Military action will increase the levels of violence and instability inside Syria, within the region, and potentially even globally.
  • Extremist forces in the region have the most to gain from military strikes, which will use the direct US involvement as a recruitment tool and potential target.
  • Syrian civilians could face greater repression by the government in retaliation for US military strikes, as happened in Kosovo in 1999 when many more Kosovars were thrown out of their homes after the US/NATO bombing began.
  • Military strikes could fuel escalation of all five wars underway in Syria: the civil war, the regional power war between Saudi Arabia and Iran, the global war of words between the US and Russia, the sectarian war between Shi’a and Sunnis, and the war over nuclear policy between the US/Israel and Iran – all now being fought to the last Syrian.

 

WHAT HAPPENS THE DAY AFTER?

  • If Syria retaliates against US troops or ships, or US bases in neighboring countries, or Israel, it is almost certain the US response would risk regional escalation and a dramatic expansion of US involvement in Syria’s civil war.

 

Adapted from “Striking Syria: Illegal, Immoral, and Dangerous” by Phyllis Bennis on Aljazeera

About these ads

23 Responses to Excellent Talking Points on Syria from our colleague Phyllis Bennis…

  1. Please use the Danish documentary “The War Campaign: How To Sell A War” as a central tool in peace efforts. Please post about the film, show it to your readers, and tell the world about it.
    Thank you,
    Jerry

  2. Ronald L. Waldron says:
    September 9, 2013 at 1:36 pm

    CRISIS IN AMERICA REMAINS:

    ISRAEL REMAINS TO BE THE CRISIS:

    Israel, given weapons of mass destruction by President
    Johnson, after they were denied such by President Kennedy;
    need to admit they have nuclear war heads.

    The Israeli’s need to sign a non-proliferation agreement,
    allow inspections of all facilities, and agree to the 1967
    border agreement.

    Nothing will be resolved in the middle East, or end the
    world wide crisis until such agreements are met .

    When Israel agrees to stop the aggressions, agrees to
    the inspections. Agrees to international cooperation.
    Agrees to the 1967 border agreement. Agrees that
    AIPAC is a foreign lobby active in corrupt political
    activity with-in the USA, and register such as a foreign
    lobby.

    The entire World can agree on PEACE4ALL .

    Something myself and many others have worked diligently
    toward for the last 12-15 years.

    Google: Fighting terrorism at home & abroad . Google: Ronald L. Waldron. Go to: http://www.universal-peace.com

  3. […] of Assad reveals that Western leaders still value regime change more than peace. To paraphrase Phyllis Bennis, the U.S. and its allies are still willing to fight to the last […]

  4. […] of Assad reveals that Western leaders still value regime change more than peace. To paraphrase Phyllis Bennis, the U.S. and its allies are still willing to fight to the last […]

  5. […] que os líderes ocidentais ainda valorizam mais a mudança do regime que a paz. Parafraseando  Phyllis Bennis , os EUA e seus aliados ainda estão dispostos a lutar até o último […]

  6. […] of Assad reveals that Western leaders still value regime change more than peace. To paraphrase Phyllis Bennis, the U.S. and its allies are still willing to fight to the last Syrian. 33. Uruguay The foreign […]

  7. […] of Assad reveals that Western leaders still value regime change more than peace. To paraphrase Phyllis Bennis, the U.S. and its allies are still willing to fight to the last […]

  8. […] of Assad reveals that Western leaders still value regime change more than peace. To paraphrase Phyllis Bennis [91], the U.S. and its allies are still willing to fight to the last […]

  9. […] of Assad reveals that Western leaders still value regime change more than peace. To paraphrase Phyllis Bennis, the U.S. and its allies are still willing to fight to the last […]

  10. […] of Assad reveals that Western leaders still value regime change more than peace. To paraphrase Phyllis Bennis, the U.S. and its allies are still willing to fight to the last […]

  11. […] of Assad reveals that Western leaders still value regime change more than peace. To paraphrase Phyllis Bennis, the US and its allies are still willing to fight to the last […]

  12. […] of Assad reveals that Western leaders still value regime change more than peace. To paraphrase Phyllis Bennis, the US and its allies are still willing to fight to the last […]

  13. […] of Assad reveals that Western leaders still value regime change more than peace. To paraphrase Phyllis Bennis, the U.S. and its allies are still willing to fight to the last […]

  14. […] revela que os líderes ocidentais valorizam mais a mudança de regime do que a paz. Parafraseando, Phillys Bennis, os EUA e seus aliados ainda estão dispostos a lutar até o último […]

  15. […] of Assad reveals that Western leaders still value regime change more than peace. To paraphrase Phyllis Bennis, the U.S. and its allies are still willing to fight to the last […]

  16. […] of Assad reveals that Western leaders still value regime change more than peace. To paraphrase Phyllis Bennis, the U.S. and its allies are still willing to fight to the last […]

  17. […] revela que os líderes ocidentais valorizam mais a mudança de regime do que a paz. Parafraseando, Phillys Bennis, os EUA e seus aliados ainda estão dispostos a lutar até o último […]

  18. […] of Assad reveals that Western leaders still value regime change more than peace. To paraphrase Phyllis Bennis, the U.S. and its allies are still willing to fight to the last […]

  19. […] of Assad reveals that Western leaders still value regime change more than peace. To paraphrase Phyllis Bennis, the U.S. and its allies are still willing to fight to the last […]

  20. […] of Assad reveals that Western leaders still value regime change more than peace. To paraphrase Phyllis Bennis, the U.S. and its allies are still willing to fight to the last Syrian. 33. Uruguay The foreign […]

  21. […] of Assad reveals that Western leaders still value regime change more than peace. To paraphrase Phyllis Bennis, the U.S. and its allies are still willing to fight to the last […]

  22. Marketing agencies in Sydney can be helpful in providing you the
    right kind of guidance in this respect if you are operating from Sydney.
    Learn how to use Facebook marketing by reading the tips in this article and getting your social
    media campaigns running today. Social media marketing also provides a very inexpensive way of building your brand.

  23. It’s really very complex in this full of activity life to
    listen news on TV, therefore I just use world wide web for that purpose, and take the most recent information.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 13,050 other followers

%d bloggers like this: